Here, there's significant potential for retouching time to be slashed if your application does a good job out of the gate.ġ00% crops from Epson Scan. Dust reduction is another matter, at least if your scanner supports infrared dust reduction. This is possibly due to SilverFast's higher default sharpening, and is shown here at 200% scale for emphasis.Įpson and SilverFast do the best job of dust reductionĬolor correction and grain reduction are both relatively easy to fix in Photoshop after scanning, though. SilverFast seemed more prone to scanning artifacts than its rivals, although I did notice them to some extent in the other apps too.
SilverFast, meanwhile, was prone to introducing unsightly banding artifacts that its rivals avoided. While Epson Scan's grain reduction is stronger at its maximum, it visibly softened fine detail more than did VueScan. Of the three, I have to give this one to VueScan. Clockwise from top left: uncorrected, high, medium and low grain correction. Clockwise from top left: uncorrected, high, medium and low grain correction.ġ00% crops from VueScan. Clockwise from top left: uncorrected, high, medium and low grain correction.ġ00% crops from SilverFast. Each program was operating at its defaults other than the grain correction.ġ00% crops from Epson Scan. The 100% crops below come from this overall scene. All three programs allow a three-step control over grain reduction strength.
This was in part because each app's varying tone curves and sharpening tended to emphasize grain differently in the first place, and also because I mostly tended to shoot only film at ISO 800 or below.
0 kommentar(er)
